Text version of this daf: original and translation
Nazir 41b — the Talmud in English
And if he wrote the Merciful One “his head” alone and did not write “his beard,” I would have said I would say: Even though it implies from “his head two things even though the following two laws can…
Original text — Nazir 41b
ואי כתב
רחמנא "
ראשו
" לבד
ולא כתב זקנו, הוה אמינא
[הייתי אומר]:
אף כי
משמע
מ"ראשו"
תרתי
[אף על פי שיש ללמוד מ"ראשו" את שני הדינים הבאים]:
א.
דאתי עשה ודחי את לא תעשה
, כשם שתגלחת מצורע דוחה את הלאו דהקפת הראש.
ב.
ומשמע
עוד,
ד
"
הקפת כל הראש שמה הקפה
" -
ו
אולם
אכתי
תגלחת מצורע שהיא
בתער
דוקא
מנלן!?
להכי כתב רחמנא
"
זקנו
", שמזה אנו לומדים שתגלחת המצורע היא בתער דוקא, וכפי שנתבאר לעיל בגמרא.
ומוסיפה הגמרא לפרש:
ורבי אליעזר
, הלומד מ"ראשו" שהמצורע הנזיר מגלח את ראשו בתער,
דאתי עשה ודחי את לא תעשה
[שמפסוק זה לומדים חכמים שעשה דוחה את לא תעשה] -
מנליה
[מנין לו]!?
ומשנינן:
יליף
רבי אליעזר שעשה דוחה את לא תעשה
מגדילים
[מציצית] -
דתניא
: נאמר בתורה "
לא תלבש שעטנז
צמר ופשתים יחדיו. גדילים תעשה לך על ארבע כנפות כסותך אשר תכסה בה"; ולכך נסמכה פרשת ציצית לשעטנז -
Translation
And if he wrote
the Merciful One
“his head”
alone
and did not write “his beard,” I would have said
I would say:
Even though
it implies
from “his head
two things
even though the following two laws can be learned from “his head”]:
1.
that a positive commandment comes and overrides a prohibition,
just as the shaving of a leper overrides the prohibition of rounding the head.
2.
And it also implies
further,
that “
rounding the entire head is called rounding” —
and
however,
still
the shaving of a leper, which is
with a razor
specifically,
from where do we know it!?
Therefore the Merciful One wrote “
his beard,”
from which we learn that the shaving of a leper is specifically with a razor, as was explained above in the Gemara.
And the Gemara adds to explain:
And Rabbi Eliezer,
who learns from “his head” that the leper who is a nazirite shaves his head with a razor,
that a positive commandment comes and overrides a prohibition
from this verse the Sages learn that a positive commandment overrides a prohibition —
from where does he derive it
from where does he derive it!?
And we answer:
Rabbi Eliezer derives
that a positive commandment overrides a prohibition
from gedilim
from tzitzit —
for it is taught:
It is stated in the Torah: “
You shall not wear shaatnez
wool and linen together. You shall make for yourself twisted threads on the four corners of the garment with which you cover yourself”; and for this reason the section of tzitzit was juxtaposed to shaatnez —